This was more or less our debate for about 1/2 an hour in my EdPsych class today. Well, that was the kicker question to get the debate into gear.
Based on the article, I had to go with no.
Psycho soccer moms (and dads), yes.
But normal parents who put their kids into organized sports, no.
Psycho crazy soccer parents discussed in the article put their kids on travelling teams at age 7 or under and start them on competitive teams at age 3 or 4. That is too young. (Except for maybe gymnastics, because after that, you can’t actually learn it well anymore.)
Normal parents, as far as I am concerned, should give their kids (about K-2) a choice of being in a sport or not during the summer, and let them pick it. Then you take your kid to practice, go to their games, and be a normal parent. You do not shout insults at the other team or yell at your kid for missing the stupid ball. (Because I never missed it???) No living vicariously through your child. If the kid doesn’t like the sport, don’t make them stay in it!
I guess the real point of this debate was the purpose behind why we shove kids off to activities all the time. Parents are so busy, their kids have to be too. And organized sports seem like the safest activity to send your kids to. According to one of my classmates, “I don’t let my kids play outside alone. I have a fenced-in yard. But I’m not letting them go outside by themselves. I’d never let them go a block away to play with a neighbor.”
It seems sad to me that we’ve reached a point where we’re too scared to let kids play outside in their own yards. Does that mean that if I let my kids play outside, I’m a bad parent? Or I’m putting my kids in danger? I ran around outside, over to the neighbor girls, and rode bike all over the paths. I just told my mom where I was going. Seems good enough to me… Maybe it depends on the neighborhood? I don’t know. I guess we’ll have to figure that out when we get kids.
Recent Comments